Needing Some Help Here

How many times we said over the last couple of years – one of two likely scenarios would happen in November.  Either there would be massive voter fraud, or some catastrophe would be generated by Obama that would allow for enacting Martial Law.
The second has not materialized – at this point.  I want to address the first.
The video at the end of this post is an eye opener.  A computer programmer testifies how he wrote a program to rig the results of elections.  He names names.  The part of it I would like some help on is the actual courtroom setting – where did this take place?  Supposedly Ohio but because Maxine Waters is involved it makes me wonder.  I haven’t had time to vet it further.  If anyone can give additional background that would be great, otherwise when I have time to look further I will do so and post here.
Using words or phrases repeatedly has the effect of numbing one to their use – a general acceptance often results.  Voter fraud is one of those terms.  It has been talked about enough that now, at the point where we know there has been a certain amount of it – too many people go on to some other subject.  It is dangerous to set this aside just because we are all worn out with the whole damn subject.
When one looks at the election results – conservatism was utterly creamed, America the pan handler emerged victorious.  I reject that vision of America and therefore will add a few more tidbits for consideration of the voter fraud idea.
Alan West defeated?  I don’t buy it and neither does he according to
this article and he is demanding a recount in specific areas. 
At The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Strange Data Point.  The post is hours old, numbers will have changed as counting continues, but the point that was made – the number of votes produced 2008 vs 2012 – they just don’t add up.  Obama showed ten million votes fewer than in ’08, and Romney showed two thousand votes fewer than McCain got in ’08.  I believe the first – with twenty-three million people out of work there have to be more than a few who aren’t betting on the “he’ll get it in the next four years” talking point.  The McCain compared to Romney votes I do not buy.  Four years of actual results, not just projections, but actual results of Obama policies and fewer conservatives are going to show up at the polls?  Not facking possible.
Ann Barnhardt – you will have to go to her site and read the whole piece for yourself as one cannot link to her posts.  An excerpt –
Now do you understand why I had precious little to say about the “election”? The results of this election were determined in 2008, including the faux-opposition candidate. You people who have spent the last several months breathlessly agonizing over this, analyzing fake polls and deluding yourselves into believing that this was somehow a legitimate operation are just sad. You’re like the people in Iraq who supported the opposition candidate to Saddam Hussein for all of those years. Yes, Saddam Hussein held “elections”. Regularly. That is what happened here yesterday. We had a Saddam Hussein “election”.
The election has been called, the pundits puke out all the why’s of how the conservatives showed so poorly, Boehner already giving in to higher taxes, O’s ready to go after guns again, the film maker of the anti-islam video (Benghazi) has been sentenced to a year in jail where he certainly won’t be able to talk – and that’s just the tip of the iceberg on the first day.
Many of us shut down out of total disgust for the last twenty-four hours to let this all sink in and figure where to go from here.  To a one I’m betting there is agreement – now is NOT the time to stop looking for answers to a whole lot of unanswered questions.
Another patriot doing a lot of digging – columnist Erik RushPrepare For The Worst – well worth the read and his twitter site is where I found the video below.

This entry was posted in We The People and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Needing Some Help Here

  1. bydesign001 says:

    It appears that my comments did not go through. If so, please feel free to delete this one. Thank you.


    As per WIKIPEDIA, individual in the video is:
    “Clinton Eugene “Clint” Curtis (born 1958 near Salem, Illinois) is a United States computer programmer[1] and ex employee of NASA and ExxonMobil, currently living in Northern California, who worked for Yang Enterprises (YEI) in Oviedo, Florida until February 2001. He is notable chiefly for making a series of whistleblower allegations about his former employer and about Republican Congressman Tom Feeney, including an allegation that in 2000, Feeney and Yang Enterprises requested Curtis’s assistance in a scheme to steal votes by inserting fraudulent code into touch screen voting systems….
    ….Curtis originally stated that his employer, Yang Enterprises, specifically told him that he had been asked to develop code not to test voting security, but in order to commit vote fraud. ‘Her words were that it was needed to control the vote in West Palm Beach, Florida,’ Curtis said. ‘Once she said, ‘We need to steal an election,’ that put me back. I made it clear that I could not produce code that could do that and no one else should….”

    It turns out that the Curtis Saga was turned into a two documentaries and a movie. Yeah, I know Hollywood. YOu may wish to check out the post at this link. It’s an interesting read.

    Murder, Spies & Voting Lies: The Clint Curtis Story

    Cyber Theft of US Elections
    “…Curtis led a high-tech workshop at the 2005 Nashville conference where he showed how a mere twenty-four lines of code could flip votes without anyone’s knowledge.
    In October of 2000, Curtis worked as the technology advisor to Yang Enterprises, Inc. At the time, Yang held top secret contracts with NASA and several other government agencies, including Florida. According to Curtis’ affidavit filed with the House Judiciary Committee, he met with consultant Tom Feeney (now-Congressman, R-FL, 24th District); Yang CEO, Li-Woan Yang; and her executive secretary, Mike Cohen. During that meeting, Feeney asked if Yang could develop vote-switching software. Feeney specified that:
    ‘(a) the program needed to be touch-screen capable, (b) the user should be able to trigger the program without any additional equipment, (c) the programming to accomplish this remain hidden even if the source code was inspected.’
    Tom Feeney is closely tied to George W. Bush…”

    Great post LadyRaven. Something definitely stinks in this election. The numbers simply do not add up.

    Reblogged, and linked back to you.

  2. Pingback: If you voted for Obama, or helped the Democrats steal the election: Go back to Africa! — 1389 Blog - Counterjihad!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s